PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK MELALUI DUNIA MAYA (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 313/PID.SUS/2021/PN MND)

Authors

  • Yeremia Tamburian Universitas Pembangunan Indonesia Manado
  • Christovel J. Timah Universitas Pembangunan Indonesia Manado
  • Valent S. Pontororing Universitas Pembangunan Indonesia Manado

Abstract

Abstract

Ontologically, to qualify a person to be convicted, two substantive conditions must be met, namely the existence of subjective requirements or criminal acts and objective requirements or intentions of the perpetrators of the crime. If these two conditions are met then a person can be convicted. Based on this principle, de facto there is a case in decision number 294/Pid.B/2020/PN.Mnd regarding defamation through cyberspace. In this case, the judge not only considers the aspect of the crime but also the intention of the perpetrator. With these considerations, the judge came to the conclusion that both aspects were met. So the judge decided that the perpetrator was found guilty of defamation through cyberspace. Based on the description above, it can be concluded that the legal construction built by judges in adjudicating defamation cases through cyberspace a quo is justifiable. Because, using the standard terms of punishment correctly.

 

Key Words: Defamation; Cyberspace.

References

DAFTAR BACAAN

A. Z. Abidin, Asas-Asas hukum Pidana Bagian Pertama, Alumni, Bandung, 1987.

Amir Ilyas, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Rangkang Education Yogyakarta & PuKAP-Indonesia, Yogyakarta, 2012.

Barda Nawawi Arief, Beberapa Aspek Kebijakan Penegakan dan Pengembangan Hukum Pidana, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2005.

Dikdik M. Arief dan Elisatris Gultom, Cyber Law; Aspek Hukum Teknologi Informasi, Refika Aditama, Jakarta, 2009.

Eddy O.S Hiariej, Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana, Edisi Revisi, Cahaya Atmapustaka, Yogyakarta, 2016.

Leden Marpaung, Proses Penanganan Perkara Pidana (Penyidikan dan Penyelidikan), Cetakan Ketiga, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2011.

Lukman Hakim, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Deepublish, Yogyakarta, 2019.

P.A.F. Lamintang, Dasar-dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 1997.

Teguh Prasetyo, Hukum Pidana, Raja Grafindo, Jakarta, 2011.

Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Atas Undangundang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.

Ambaranie Nadiaa Kemala Movanita, Pencemaran Nama Baik, Kejahatan Siber yang Paling Banyak Di Tangani Polisi, dikutip dari: https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2018/03/12/07353601/pencemaran-nama-baik-kejahatan-siber-yang-paling-banyak-ditangani-polisi?page=all pada hari Kamis 25 Agustus 2022, Pukul 08.12 Wita.

Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Agung RI, Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia: Pidana Khusus: ITE, dikutip dari: Direktori https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/index/kategori/ite-1.html, pada hari Jumat, 26 Agustus 2022, Pukul 20.08 Wita.

Syamsul Ashar, Pidana di UU ITE Efektik Menjerat Pengguna Medsosw, Hingga Oktober ada https://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/pidana-di-uu-ite-efektif-menjerat-pengguna-medsos-hingga-oktober-ada-324-kasus.

Published

2023-02-15

How to Cite

Tamburian, Y., Timah, C. J., & Pontororing, V. S. (2023). PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK MELALUI DUNIA MAYA (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 313/PID.SUS/2021/PN MND). Journal Scientia De Lex, 10(3). Retrieved from https://www.ejournal.unpi.ac.id/index.php/scientia/article/view/532